The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Great Minds Series) |
|
|
|
| Title: | The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Great Minds Series) |
| Author: | John Austin |
| Publisher: | Prometheus Books |
| Type: | Book / Paperback |
| Publication Date: | November, 2000 |
| ISBN / ISBN-13: | 1573928453 / 9781573928458 |
| List Price: | $16.98 |
| You Save: | $5.33 |
| Amazon Price: | $11.65 |
|
This book is also available, brand-new, from 3rd-party marketplace sellers at Amazon.com, from $10.39.
|
The HTML code below can be pasted onto your web-site, your MySpace page, or blog - or any number of similar places - to create a link to this page:
If, instead of a text link, you'd like to create a link to this page which will display the book cover, if it's available, then the code below will do exactly that:
Check for the same book at these other US book sites:
• [ Abebooks ]
• [ Alibris ]
• [ Barnes & Noble ]
• [ Half.com ]
• [ Powells ]
… or check UK bookstores
|
Editorial Review / Publisher's Information:
Product Description
A work that has had a profound influence on the study of English and American law, "The Province of Jurisprudence Determined" is a model of rigorous and clear analysis. With its publication Austin brought order to the disparate elements of a legal profession that up until his time was largely unsystematic. Although he was greatly respected by a small circle of supporters, including Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, his work received little attention beyond his friends during his lifetime. It was only after Austin's death that his writings began to attract general notice. Then his analysis became the focal point for strong disagreements over the true nature of law, the definition of law as a form of command with implied sanctions, and the problem of differentiating legal authority, political power, and morality. The later fame of his work appears to have resulted from the controversies it generated. Perhaps Austin's most significant contribution was to make a clear distinction between 'positive law' (ie: laws decreed by the sovereign or government) and moral principles (which he terms the 'law of God'). In so doing he defined the field of inquiry for later students. Also of interest is the influence of utilitarian philosophy on his analysis: for example, he viewed the principle of social utility as a benchmark for discerning God's commands and hence for judging the overall moral quality of rules of conduct. Whether one agrees or disagrees with Austin's analysis, it is clear that his work is now established as indispensable for all discussions of jurisprudence.
|
Other Items You May Enjoy:
Browse Books From These Related Subjects:
Customer Reviews:
• One Of The "founders" Of "legal Positivism"
16 January, 2009
I read this book for a class on the philosophy of law. The English legal philosopher and jurist, John Austin, was instrumental in developing the theory of legal positivism, which held that there had to be a separation between religious laws of morality and positive or human made law. In his book "The Provence of Jurisprudence Determined," he delineates how laws are made and obeyed. "Every positive law, or every law simply and strictly so called, is set, directly or circuritously, by a sovereign person or body, to a member or members of the independent political society wherein that person or body is sovereign or supreme" (253-254). Therefore, in a representative democracy, the people are the sovereign and either they or their elected representatives produce the laws.
Austin argued against judges interpreting their nation's constitution or law code to make perceived necessary changes to keep up with changing social values. Austin believes that in a democratic society, the people are sovereign and thus a nation's constitution and law code should be changed by the people's elected representatives and not by appointed judges. Austin is not against citizens changing their Constitution or laws, "... the Constitution should keep up to date--but it should keep up to date with the views of the people."
Austin's genius was in his perception of the history of how nations govern, which has provided ample proof that there is a direct correlation between those democracies that maintain a healthy balance of powers between the branches of government and are the same democracies that are most protected from the danger of slipping into tyranny; whether it is rule by a dictator or rule by a politically privileged few, such as an oligarchy.
Recommended reading for those interested in philosophy, history, and political science.
- Amazon Customer Review
|
